MAN 2974/2975/2976/2977 Managing for excellence

APPLIES TO ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016
Norwegian version

MAN 2974/2975/2976/2977 Managing for excellence


Responsible for the course
Arne Carlsen, Svein S Andersen, Jon Erland Lervik

Department
Department of Leadership and Organizational Behaviour

Term
According to study plan

ECTS Credits
30

Language of instruction
Norwegian

Introduction
This is a program on how to manage for excellence in organizations through a dual attention to what makes people thrive and grow and what creates extraordinary performances. The course assumes that employee and group thriving is the key to organizational excellence and that we need to understand how work practice can be generative for both individuals and organizations. Drive, energy, initiative, humility and action orientation are the basis virtues seek to develop.

We build on a fairly new and exciting tradition of research and managerial practice called Positive Organizational Scholarship. We also borrow from recent developments within practice-based approaches to organizations, narrative psychology, philosophy and the field of “design thinking”.

The target group of the program is middle managers, project managers, domain experts and other professionals in business, voluntary organizations and the public sector: people who are responsible for developing the performances of themselves and others in organizations.

We emphasize practice from both an academic and an action oriented point of view. Leadership and professional creativity to bring about excellence is first of all something that takes place sin everyday practice, something that we do.

You will be challenged to discover and/or cultivate those generative practices in which you yourself can thrive, manage at your best and be valuable to others. In line with the focus on practice, the course will present rich examples from recent research along with new theory and historical overviews. The course has five main themes. Each of them will be the subject of a separate program session.

1. High quality connections and energizing behavior
2. Motivation and driving forces
3. Positive organizational change and professional creativity
4. Experiments and prototyping
5. Culture and networks of excellence


    Learning outcome
    The overall objective of the course is to provide knowledge, skills and attitudes for how to manage for excellence in organizations through professional creativity and generative practices. Three types of learning outcomes are sought:

    a. Acquired knowledge: Students will acquire solid research based knowledge on how to manage for excellence in organizations. After having completed the program, the participants will have deep insights into key terms, approaches, theoretical roots and rich examples of practice within all the five program areas.

    b. Acquired skills:
    - Practical tools: Students will acquire capabilities to manage for excellence in organization through practical experiences with a range of new tools. Some of these tools will enable the participants to better lead development processes with a focus on learning from positive deviance, visualizing progress, prototyping, user involvement and making physical space for creative collaboration. Other tools will enable the participants to create relations and practices that drive performance in many settings
    - Personal development: The program will seek to practice what it preaches in terms of offering students possibilities to use theory and tools purposively to develop themselves and others.

    c. Acquired attitudes: Participants will also be taught the basic attitudes, values and perspectives on life that are assumed central in managing for excellence. Key words here are initiative, action capability, openness, other-orientation, long terms views, tolerance for failure and respect for the people one interacts with, within and outside one’s organization. All themes that are taught have ethical questions and dilemmas that participants are exposed to through exercises and discussions.

    Prerequisites
    Bachelor degree or equivalent and 4 years of work experience. Please consult our Student regulations.

    Compulsory reading
    Books:
    Amabile, Teresa , Steven Kramer. 2011. The progress principle : using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Harvard Business Review Press
    Andersen, Svein S. and Lar Tore Ronglan, eds. 2012. Nordic elite sport : same ambitions - different tracks. Universitetsforlaget
    Brown, Tim with Barry Katz. 2009. Change by design : how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business
    Carlsen, Arne, Stewart Clegg, Reidar Gjersvik. 2013. Idea work : om profesjonell kreativitet. Cappelen Damm akademisk
    Collins, Jim and Morten T. Hansen. 2011. Great by choice : uncertainty, chaos, and luck? - why some thrive despite. Harper Business
    Dutton, Jane E. 2003. Energize your workplace : how to create and sustain high-quality connections at work. Jossey-Bass
    Grant, Adam. 2014. Gi og ta : hvordan lykkes gjennom å hjelpe andre. Cappelen Damm
    Kvalnes, Øyvind. 2012. Etikk og samfunnsansvar. Universitetsforlaget
    Sims, Peter. 2011. Little bets : how breakthrough ideas emerge from small discoveries. Random House Business


    Recommended reading

    Course outline

    Bergen
    Oslo
    1. Kvalitet og energi i relasjoner
    14-17 sep, 2015
    21-24 sep, 2015
    2. Motivasjon og drivkrefter
    23-26 nov, 2015
    23-26 nov, 2015
    3. Positivt orientert utviklingsarbeid
    18-21 jan, 2015, Oslo
    4. Eksperimentering og prototyping
    29 feb - 03 mars, 2015
    07-10 mars, 2015
    5. Kultur og nettverk for varige prestasjoner
    11-14 april, 2015
    18-21 april, 2015

    Meeting 1: High-quality connections and energizing behavior.

    Objectives
    · Get a broad introduction to the program and the lecturers, as well as getting to know and create relations to other participants
    · Learn about key concepts and approaches within Positive Organizational Scholarship and some of the other main theoretical perspectives in the program
    · Master and being able to apply theory about high-quality connections and energizing behavior as a basis for managing for excellence
    · Kick-start the individual reflection log and clarify expectations to personal learning and achievements during the program, as well as organizational benefits

    Cases: Southwest Airlines, elite skiing, oil exploration, ship building

    Mandatory readings
    Carlsen, A. Clegg, S. and Gjersvik, R. (2012). Idea Work. Lessons of the Extraordinary in Everyday Creativity. Cappelen Damm, kap 1, 9 and 10. (56 pages)
    Collins, J. and Hansen, T. (2011). Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck--Why Some Thrive Despite Them All. New York: HarperCollins, side 1-38
    Dutton, J.E. (2003). Breathing life into organization studies. Journal of Management Inquiry 12, 5-19
    Dutton, J.E. (2003). Energize Your Workplace. How to Create and Sustain High-Quality Connections at Work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (page 1-51; 79-139)
    Grant, A. (2014). Given and Take. A Revolutionary Approach to Success. Viking Press, pg 8-39.
    Best når det gjelder. Del 1 i Vinnerskaller (A.J. Riise, B. Stensbøl og A.M. Pensgaard)s. 12-33


    Meeting 2: Motivation and driving forces

    Objectives
    · Acquire deep understanding of the motivational basis for achieving excellence
    · Be able to apply this understanding to develop the motivation of oneself and others to pursue the extraordinary
    · Understand and be able to apply theory on pro-social motivation through end user involvement, including the power of mastering experiences and the visualizing of progress
    · Gain experience in using the reflected best self-portrait exercise as well as mechanisms for energizing behavior in one’s own organization
    · Start term paper projects linked to strategic development challenges in (some of) the participants’ own organizations

    Case: Muhammed Ali in When We Were Kings, Jiro Dreams of Sushi

    Mandatory readings
    Andersen, Svein. 2013. Casestudier. Kapittel 1 & 2.
    Amabile, T. and S. Kramer (2011). The Progress Principle. Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement and Creativity at Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, kap 1, 4, 5 and 6 (ca. 70 pages)

    Carlsen, A. Clegg, S. and Gjersvik, R. (2012). Idea Work. Lessons of the Extraordinary in Everyday Creativity. Oslo: Cappelen Damm, kap 4, 5 and 6. (ca. 50 pages)

    Grant, A.M. (2011). How customers can rally your troops: End users can energize your workforce far better than your managers can. Harvard Business Review, June: 97–103.
    Kvalnes, Ø. (2012), Etikk og samfunnsansvar, del 2 og 3 (46s)
    Roberts, L. M., Dutton, J. E., Spreitzer, G., Heaphy, E., and R. E. Quinn (2005). “Composing the reflected best self-portrait. Building pathways for becoming extraordinary in organizations.” Academy of Management Review 30 (4): 712-736.

    Meeting 3: Positive organizational change and professional creativity

    Objectives

    • Gain deep knowledge of systematic prepping for creativity and extraordinary performance
    • Understanding positive organizational change as systematically searching for and reinforcing positive deviance, looking for the positive in the negative and daring to stretch for the extraordinary
    • To acquire deep knowledge of practices and philosophy for performance development in two of Norway's high-performance organizations
    • Discuss experiences with the first phase of student term paper projects and set the final design

    Case: Snøhetta, Olympiatoppen

    Mandatory readings
    Andersen, S. and Ronglan, L. T. (red.). (2011). Nordic Elite Sport. Same Ambitions, Different Tracks, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, Chap 13 and 14 (50 pages)
    Andersen, S. (forthcoming 2013). Casestudier - forskningsstrategi, generalisering og forklaring. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget. Chao 3,4 and 6.
    Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design. How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: HarperCollins. (page 1-86)
    Carlsen, A. Clegg, S. and Gjersvik, R. (2012). Idea Work. Lessons of the Extraordinary in Everyday Creativity. Oslo: Cappelen Damm, chap 2, 3 and 11. (ca 45 pages)
    Collins, J. and Hansen, T. (2011). Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck--Why Some Thrive Despite Them All. New York: HarperCollins, 1-39.

    Meeting 4: Experiments and prototyping

    Objectives
    · Know the theoretical basis for and practices of different kinds of experiential learning as a work form in development projects, including prototyping and design of small experiments
    · Get deep knowledge of design thinking bith in terms f theoretical roots and use in concrete development tasks
    · Start to reap the awards of term paper projects and take a closer look at its prototypes
    · Understand the theory and practice of making space for creative collaboration –through rooms, walls and artifacts, in particular with regards to visual sharing and early phase project mobilization

    Cases: Apple, Ulstein, design firm

    Mandatory readings
    Andersen, S. (2009). Stor suksess gjennom små, intelligente feil. Erfaringsbasert kunnskapsutvikling i toppidretten. Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning 50(4): 427-461.
    Andersen, S.S. og Hansen, P.Ø. (2014) “Coaching elite athletes: How do coaches stimulate elite athletes’ reflections?” Sport Coaching Review
    Andersen, S.S. & P.Ø. Hansen (2015 – in press) How elite athletes reflect on their training: Strong beliefs – ambiguous feedback signals. Journal of Reflective Practice.
    Carlsen, A. Clegg, S. and Gjersvik, R. (2012). Idea Work. Lessons of the Extraordinary in Everyday Creativity. Oslo: Cappelen Damm, chap 7 and 8. (35 pages)
    Edmondson, A.C. (2011). Strategies of learning from failure, Harvard business review 89(4): 48-55
    'Eksperimentering: å fungere i et ufullkomment system',
    Kapittel 6 i Julian Birkinshaw (2014) Bli en bedre sjef. Cappelen Damm.
    Sims. P. (2011). Little Bets: How Breakthrough Ideas Emerge from Small Discoveries. New York: Free Press. (page 1-163)



    Meeting 5: Culture and networks of excellence

    Objectives
    · Learn about what characterizes organizations that remain high-performing through long periods of time
    · Understand how excellence is developed and anchored in organizational culture and external networks
    · Get and overview of and be able to analyze approaches to high-performance cultures, including the comparison of experiences fro elite sports, businesses and industrial clusters
    · Being able to understand and critically assess recipes for managing for excellence
    · Presentation and last look at term paper
    · Summarize key learning across all five program themes

    Case: Danone, education, Antoinette Tuff

    Mandatory readings
    Andersen, S. og Sæther, Ø. (2009). Kompetansemobilisering for prestasjonsutvikling. Hvordan oppnå fremragende resultater med vanlige medarbeidere? Magma 1(11). 10 pages.
    Andersen, S. and Ronglan, L. T. (red.). (2011). Nordic Elite Sport. Same Ambitions, Different Tracks, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, chap 1 and 2 (30 pages)
    Collins, J. and Hansen, T. (2011). Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck--Why Some Thrive Despite Them All. New York: HarperCollins, page 39-170.
    Colville, I. D., Waterman, R. H. and Weick, K. E. (1999). Organizing and the search for excellence: making sense of the times in theory and practice. Organization 6(1): 128-149.
    Dweck, C. (2010). Mind-sets and equitable education. Principal Leadership 10(5), 26–29.
    Lervik, J. E., Hennestad, B. W., Lunnan, R., Amdam, R. P. and Nilsen, S. (2005). Implementing human resource development best practices -- replication or re-creation? Human Resource Development International 8(3): 345-360.



      Computer-based tools
      It's learning

      Learning process and workload
      This is a program that rests on the assumption that learning presupposes active participation. Qualitative research and process approaches form the methodological basis for the program, with an emphasis on detailed understanding of everyday practices and development processes.

      We pursue the following learning strategies in our teaching:
      • Discussion of real situations, decisions and cases that are messy and complex and therefore ideal for fully engaging the experience f participants in developing judgment
      • Discussion of new research that challenges common sense and established mental models.
      • Brief overviews of theoretical roots
      • Introduction of tools, of which some are chosen for active experimentation by participants in their own organizations
      • Discussions of mini-cases with ethical dilemmas

      The program also offers a range of activities for learning in and between the meetings. The most important individual learning activities include:
      • Personal log with brief reflections from meetings and exercises, including small excerpts (less than 1 pg) posted on itslearning;
      • Active experimentation with mechanisms for positive organizational change, energizing behavior etc in one’s own organizations between meetings, including:
      • Reflected best self-portrait: use of new tool for systematic and positive performance reviews, geared to see new opportunities and facilitate personal growth

      The participants will work in small teams on and between Meetings. You will be challenged to connect the program activities to real challenges in your own organization. Key collective learning activities include:
      • Term paper project tied to development work in the organization of one of the participants. Students establish groups of one insider plus up to two outsiders who together explore and contribute to and ongoing development process of strategic importance..
      • Prepared company visits (at Snøhetta, Statoil, Olympiatoppen and others) where participants form small groups to prepare questions and discussions.

      The program cannot be accomplished through distance learning. Participation in the program Meetings is mandatory and we expect participants to make positive contributions to the learning of others. Each participant will at the start of the program create a personal learning contract for his or her expected learning and achievements.

      The programme is conducted through five course modules, a total of 150 lecturing hours. Project tutorials differ in each Master of Management program. It will consist of personal tutorials and tutorials given in class. Generally the students may expect consulting tutorials, not evaluating tutorials. The total hours of tutorials offered is estimated to two hours pr. students following an ordinary Master of Management program. For students taking the program as their final Master of Management program the tutorials offered are estimated to a total of six hours per term paper.


      Coursework requirements

      Examination
      The students are evaluated through a term paper, counting 18 ECTS credits and a 72 hours individual home exam, counting ECTS 12 credits. Both evaluations must be passed to obtain a certificate for the program. The term paper may be written individually or in groups of maximum three persons.
      The term paper shall be linked to development work in one of the participants’ organizations. The paper can be written individually or in groups of up to three persons. The students then need to establish groups with one insider and up to two outsiders who explore a real development process of strategic importance. The work on the term paper will take place as an integrated part of the meetings with assignments between meetings.
      The individual home exam consists of a reflection note about one’s own learning base don the log used to describe and reflect over personal learning episodes (including how the learning may be used in a work situation). The note shall discuss and synthesize the students's own experience in the cntext of the relevant literature and theoretical perspectives from the course.

      For students taking this program as the final Master of Management Program the following applies:
      The students are evaluated through a term paper, counting 24 ECTS credits and a 72 hours individual home exam, counting ECTS 6 credits. The term paper may be written individually or in groups of maximum two persons. Both evaluations must be passed to obtain a certificate for the program.

      Examination code(s)
      MAN 29741 - Term paper; accounts for 100 % of the grade to pass the program MAN 2974, 18 credits
      MAN 29751 - Individual home exam; accounts for 100 % of the grade to pass the program MAN 2975, 12 credits
      Both evaluations must be passed to obtain a certificate for the program.

      For students taking this program as the final Master of Management Program the following applies:
      MAN 29761 - Term paper; accounts for 100 % of the grade to pass the program MAN 2976, 24 credits
      MAN 29771 - Individual home exam; accounts for 100 % of the grade to pass the program MAN 2977, 6 credits;.
      Both evaluations must be passed to obtain a certificate for the program.


      Examination support materials


      Re-sit examination
      It is only possible to retake an examination at the next ordinary exam. When a programme is discontinued, the retake exam will take place in a replacement programme.

      The assessment is mainly based on more than one exam code. Where this is the case, you may retake only the assessed components of one of these exam codes. Where this is not the case, all of the assessed components of the course must be retaken. All retaken examinations will incur an additional fee.


      Additional information